Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is a good 80/20 solution. 80% of the value of the attorney for (less than) 20% of the effort/cost.


What people seem to misunderstand about steveeg1 comment is that a lot of time at an attorney office is spend sifting through old cases.

Since lawyers bill in hours they either have to raise their hourly bill or lie about the hours spend in order to keep the final price tag the same.


As far as I know, litigators do spend a fair amount of time researching cases as it there job to assemble a case that is capable of being presented in court - although most litigation gets settled before going anywhere near a court.

However, in most law firms I know litigators are in the minority - and I don't think the likes of corporate lawyers spend much time researching cases?


Why should the final price tag remain the same? Free market economics says that if we introduce efficiencies, the price comes down, and/or fewer people produce the same output. In general (exception is music, as far as I can tell) that's the case. Other labor markets have suffered horrible, drastic shake-outs, why not Law?


I tend to agree, but I can't find details on how it works. Quickly reading the site I had the impression that

- its for attorneys only

- it won't be entirely free, as published are promised compensation for their "premium content"


Probably more like 100% of the fees for 20% of the cost to the law firm.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: