Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
RivieraKid
on Jan 22, 2015
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
I think I've solved the Haskell records problem
This shouldn't be a problem I think. There's not a reason to cast to Set<Object> and then look for employees there. If a function wants to accept a set of let's say emplpyees and ints, it would have a Set<Int|Employee> argument.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: