In any case, if you run a professional website, this immediately comes off as juvenile and/or amateurish. And am y people just assume it's part of your website.
Perhaps you should check if anybody else sees what you see. After browsing through every image I could find in the history of this project, I, at least, am convinced: any "sexualization" _you_ see is entirely in your head.
> ... in judeo christian societies
I really hope you're not trying to whitewash your own bias by alluding to those religions. From everything I've read of their texts, and interacted with practioners of those religions, I'm unaware of any bias that classifies _cartoon depictions of children_ as "sexual".
Perhaps you should try whitelabeling instead. Don't like the packaging? Package it yourself!
I'm not talking about furries I'm talking about the mascot of the Anubis software program, which is not in any way sexualized.
Do you believe any anthropomorphic cartoon animal must be implicitly sexual because "furries exist and have sex?" I hate to break it to you but just about everyone has sex.
Also, Looney Tunes must horrify you. Wile E. Coyote isn't even wearing any clothes at all, and they show that to children!
