> Apple knew a supplier was using child labor but took 3 years to fully cut ties (yahoo.com)
Apple routinely terminates relationships with suppliers when they identify abusive practices, sometimes they’re slow about it.
> Apple's Cooperation with Authoritarian Governments (jessesquires.com)
> Apple removes nearly 100 VPNs used by Russians to bypass censorship (elpais.com)
Apple obeys local laws
> Apple's Browser Engine Ban Persists, Even Under the DMA (open-web-advocacy.org)
Apple chooses to maintain control over a specific implementation detail of their platform that a handful of nerds object to.
> Apple defined ICE as a "protected class" in blocking anti-ICE apps (boingboing.net)
The claim made in this headline is just straight up false.
I don’t know, I don’t think their less-than-ideal behaviour is anywhere bad enough to reasonably be described as “evil”. Otherwise, we’re probably all evil.
If something is false, which the headline is, then calling it false isn't a "dismissal", it's asserting reality.
If you don't understand this, then you may have trouble with actually using logic.
> Calling well-know human right activist NGOs "handful of nerds" is straight up misinformation.
No, it's factually not. It's pejorative and not in good taste, but saying that it is "misinformation" is just a lie. (that's consistent with your previous post though)
The claim that ‘Apple defined ICE as a "protected class"’ is explicitly false, there’s nothing more that could possibly be said to dismiss it. It simply never happened!
Boingboing lied, it happens.
> Calling well-know human right activist NGOs "handful of nerds" is straight up misinformation
No it isn’t. But describing OWA the same way one might describe Amnesty International does feel somewhat dishonest.
That is an advocacy organisation serving the special interests of a handful of nerds.
