Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There may not be much risk from a legal culpability perspective if they make the appropriate disclosures somewhere in the depths of a EULA, but even so it is a failure of professional ethics to build tools which are "dangerous at any speed" and inflict them upon the world.


Oh, I don’t disagree, and I don’t think burying it in the EULA would necessarily be sufficient (especially in Europe, where the courts and regulators have tended to take a dim view of “but we told you, in three-point type on page 473 in the middle of the trademark acknowledgements”). But ultimately the blame for using known-unreliable tools is largely on the user.


They want to make back the money they invested in OpenAI. We'll be seeing similar "research" (repackaging ChatGPT) from Microsoft for a while.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: