Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The claim is that GPT-4 can reason sometimes. Evidence that GPT-4 fails to reason sometimes isn't a counterexample.


The people who made GPT-4 have said it does not reason, please for the love of god drop this nonsense.


I never said that it does. I was pointing out a logical flaw in that person's argument. Also, why are the creators of GPT-4 authorities on what does or doesn't count as reasoning?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: