Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>I was not talking about murder, I was talking about receiving money.

Well, when should it be an excuse? You didn't really seem to offer any bounds, and I put it as "a crime".

>It has to be the least enforced law ever... Because the chances of breaking that law as a phone company, or as a taxi driver are close to 100%.

I don't think the law is really targeting taxi companies or phone companies. It's targeting people who abet criminals by taking their money in exchange for services or goods.

>It's a bit sad that you are an attorney and don't seem to believe in due process.

It's not a surprise that you think that considering you clearly have no idea what due process is.

>If his lawyers "know" that he is guilty, I hope for his sake that he finds lawyers that don't "know" it, given that he is pleading not guilty.

Geez, I can't state it enough for you, huh? "Knowledge" is not an element of the crime. So everytime you say they "know" something, it's completely irrelevant to the issue and only reflects your willful misunderstanding of this entire conversation.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: