Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah, this thread is nuts to me how many people in this thread are mad. Sure, some of the words are a bit of a stretch but while going through the most I was nodding along being like, “yeah, makes sense.”

Like nobody is gonna string you up not following the guidelines but in my own writing I follow these pretty much naturally because, yeah, it’s kinda weird that we describe things with limited or reduced functionality as crippled.



Can you please avoid making casual allusions to lynching in regards to being ostracized for failing to implement this document?


This basically proves my point, if I was writing a post for public consumption at work I would avoid this language but outside that it doesn’t really matter.


Is it also weird that we describe things that completely cease to function as dead?


I think if a race of aliens saw us calling our phones dead when they break they would be a little confused since they were never alive; so in that sense yes.

The reason language has to constantly evolve for certain topics is that every time people come up with new words that don't carry stigma people invariably start using them in everyday language; so $word that was coined specifically to be neutral becomes $word (pejorative). So for example if people would just stop using whatever word is used to describe people with intellectual disabilities as an insult the vocabulary wouldn't have to keep changing.

* "What are you blind (pejorative)?"

* "What are you deaf (pejorative)?"

* "They're delusional (pejorative)!"

* "They're deranged (pejorative)!"

* "She's hysterical (pejorative)."

* "He's demented (pejorative)."

* "They're absolutely mental (pejorative)."

* "She kind of a skitso (pejorative)."

* "They're special (pejorative)."

* "What, do you need a handicap (pejorative)?"

I don't think it's a good idea to use those words even after they fall out of fashion. It just seems cruel for no reason and it's easy enough to just say something different.


Every word can be pejorative in the right context. Especially if it is a characteristic that one does not identify with. Like calling a box champion a "delicate flower", other people would consider it a compliment

As soon as you ban any word, both pejorative and intended use, the similar next one will be used in a pejorative way, which will give you the same problem later on

Seems unnecessary effort to ban most of the language because some people don't use it correctly. Especially because people are not born knowing those stigmas. So they naturally disappear


> it’s kinda weird that we describe things with limited or reduced functionality as crippled.

You just typed out how that secondary meaning came into being.


"Nuts"?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: