Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I'm not stealing anything by instructing my computer not to run code against my consent. No one is entitled to my CPU time. Least of all are advertisers.

One might argue that you are then not entitled to view the content on ad-supported pages as well.

I use an ad blocker too because many ads are just horribly intrusive, but I honestly can’t blame any page circumventing ad blockers, nor do I believe that I am somehow morally entitled to an ad-free, compensation-free browsing experience.

Narrowing all of this down to CPU time misses the point entirely in my opinion.

> They're useless noise that contribute no value to anyone beyond whoever pays for them, and therefore I find it a moral responsibility to limit my exposure to them and restrain the harm they do to others.

They‘re literally paying for the content you get to view for free.



> One might argue that you are then not entitled to view the content on ad-supported pages as well.

Then they shouldn't serve the page in a way that it can be viewed without also viewing the ads. Ad-blocker-blockers are a thing, and I am happy to close that tab and never visit the site again when I see one.

> They‘re literally paying for the content you get to view for free.

Hopefully someday they'll be forced to find a business model that doesn't include destroying the privacy of their website's visitors.


> One might argue that you are then not entitled to view the content on ad-supported pages as well.

This is true, and websites are entitled to try to detect and block users who use adblockers. And users are entitled to use better adblockers that are harder to detect.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: