I'm not saying negativity is something bad, but this guy just seems spiteful. It's a brand new product and this guy probably doesn't even need the benefit of it waking him up at a good time. He complained (sorry, repeatedly complained 20 times) about the battery, but despite knowing it only lasts 2 days he refused to charge it after 2 days. I don't get that all.
The battery bit I am with you. I don't understand for example why people complain that smartphones need to be charged every day. It's not that much of an inconvenience. Please, just plug in your phone.
On the other hand, a product's being new does not entitle it to soft treatment in a review. Even without the battery issue, it sounds like this device is not ready for prime time.
I think you're right except if you look at his review, half of his points deal with the battery not lasting 3 days. All of the other points had to deal with the app crashing when he said "I'm awake early." I doubt this applies to all phones too (even different Android phones). This also means the app/software can be improved.
"The score is based on the failures of this thing to operate, not questions relating to data relevance or actual ability to improve sleep cycles."
Where is the actual review of, "OK, so I recharged it every night, it woke me up before my alarm, and it did/didn't work." This review is useless for that.
So very true, I'm annoyed how people always compare their lower-power phones with my HTC Desire (and previous android phones). They said they can last 3-5 days without charging and I need to charge everyday. Unless you sleep every 3-4 days, charge it when you sleep, d-uh.
