Ah I see, you're talking about "hiring" as in paying a retainer fee. I thought you were saying he was hired as a full time employee, my apologies.
Assuming Reuters' wording is accurate, that actually seems fairly reasonable and in line with how I understood it.
Ah I see, you're talking about "hiring" as in paying a retainer fee. I thought you were saying he was hired as a full time employee, my apologies.
Assuming Reuters' wording is accurate, that actually seems fairly reasonable and in line with how I understood it.