Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A Sheikh in Dubai said 'My grandfather rode a camel, my father rode a camel, I drive a Mercedes, my son drives a Lamborghini, his son will drive a Lamborghini, but his son will ride a camel'.


http://www.gluckman.com/DubaiBiz.html

"My grandfather rode a camel, my father rode a camel, I drive a Mercedes, my son drives a Land Rover, his son will drive a Land Rover, but his son will ride a camel," the Sheikh was fond of saying.


"Shirtsleeves to shirtsleeves in three generations" seems to have equivalent, independent expressions in many languages.


富不过三代 (wealth doesn't last beyond 3 generations) is the Chinese.



You can definitely preserve and transfer wealth provided you are disciplined enough do certain things.

Be careful to not reproduce in excess. This is the main thing. You don't want wealth to divide too rapidly between quick generations. Ensure you invest heavily in training people to teach them how to grow their wealth through age old tested ways: Gold, Real estate, well trained children. Ensure your accumulation rate is above your spending rate.

Modern day trusts too come to mind. Kennedy's, Clinton's, Rockefeller's and Rothschild's of the world.

Wealth doesn't last for long if you don't have the discipline for it. Most people who tend to lose wealth are generally the ones who completely lose a grip on reality. Deviate so far away from the very reasons that bought them there. Bad things happen from there on.


Just a nitpick: gold is not going to grow your wealth, it will preserve your wealth. One ounce of gold is worth about a loaf of bread every day for a year. That was true in the time of King Nebuchadnezzar (600 BC), and is roughly true nowadays.


Invest heavily in creating crop-destroying pests and as bread gets more expensive, so will your gold reserves. Genius!


Yeah and losing this discipline is even harder when going from one generation to the next. The guy who built the empire knows all the sweat he put into achieving it, and he knows how it is to live with nothing. Therefore he has internal motivation to keep his wealth. But his children and their children don't know anything else but wealth. They might not even understand that it won't always be like that.


>Be careful to not reproduce in excess.

You can reproduce in excess, but you have to practice primogeniture.


> Be careful to not reproduce in excess

Or, alternatively, reproduce abundantly and use your children to make alliances with families that actually do matter.

You're advocating having few children in a thread related to Saudi Arabia, a kingdom whose founder had 20+ wives and some 100 children. That is how all the warring clans in the Arabian Peninsula were united and pacified: by marriage.


But we're not talking about pacification, we're talking about maintaining wealth within the family.

An inheritance split between 100 children, and then split again between their children a generation later is going to run out pretty quickly.

Even if it's only 4-5 children per person it will run out within a few generations.


That is a matter of wealth preservation. What about wealth creation? How much Saudi wealth is there without stability and security?

Also, why should all children inherit equally? Marry the daughters into wealth, and make sure only capable sons inherit.


> and make sure only capable sons inherit.

In an ideal world, that's a great idea. In reality, see above about camels, Mercedes and Lamborghinis.


http://time.com/money/3925308/rich-families-lose-wealth/

>70% of wealthy families lose their wealth by the second generation, and a stunning 90% by the third, according to the Williams Group wealth consultancy.

>It takes the average recipient of an inheritance 19 days until they buy a new car


While agree with the general sentiment, there are exceptions. The Shang dynasty had the longest reign in China (554 years). The Habsburg family ruled Austria for about 600 years. Paraphrasing [1]: The Japanese ruling 'family' recognises 125 monarchs beginning with the legendary Emperor Jimmu (traditionally dated to February 11, 660 BC) and continuing up to the current emperor, Akihito. Historical evidence for the first 29 emperors is marginal by modern standards, but there is firm evidence for the hereditary line since Emperor Kinmei ascended the throne 1500 years ago.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_House_of_Japan


Interesting...

The beloved leaders have reached the third generation: that could represent some hope to North Korea inhabitants.


The first generation makes it, the second generation preserves it, and the third generation spends it.


Just because he said that, it does not mean he believes in it. It's feel-good baloney.


Just because you said that, it doesn't mean he doesn't believe in it. Support your claims with proof and don't let your biases take over reason.


Proof? How do you prove someone is being sincere?


It's the other way around: you need to prove that what he says is merely feel-good baloney.

Otherwise, every person is insincere, including both yourself and I.

Side anecdote: While I haven't met and talked with the guy in person, I know a person who has. Her impressions of him was that he was an honest man who cared about his country.

Take what people say with a grain of salt unless there is reliable source that backs them up.


It is safe to assume that people with non-trivial power are very seldom sincere when making public statements.

If Dubai's elite's descendants will be riding camels some decades from now, then why does Dubai have a national wealth fund?

The truth is that Dubai's wealth fund may invest in YC or in VC funds, and some of those mocking Dubai's future will be working indirectly for the elites that run Dubai. To distract people from such master-slave reality, a bit of self-deprecation can be charming.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: