Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
pcwalton
on Nov 28, 2016
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Learning to Read X86 Assembly Language
> Makes sense considering that the intel syntax requires some backtracking (or more of temporary data).
That would imply that the Intel syntax is not LL(1) or LR(1). Are you sure?
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
That would imply that the Intel syntax is not LL(1) or LR(1). Are you sure?