Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Wired's prediction is even more annoying because they've started begging me to turn off my adblocker last time I visited them a couple of days ago (proof[0]).

If that's the future, why are they not going for it completely before their competitors? Seems like a good strategy to me if they believe in that, doesn't it?

I avoided the adblocking discussions so far, but now that I think about it, I do think that having my adblocking software on actually helps the maintainers of websites. Since I have never clicked on an ad on the Internet intentionally (I only have Internet access for about 7-8 years, Adblock was already a thing back then and I have discovered it before anyone else I know personally), I have never purchased a thing from the Internet after clicking on an ad in my life (having only a European debit card that's not supported by the US-based services kind of helps me out in this case, but it is a huge disadvantage in every other case). By not seeing them, I'm actually improving their click rate a bit, ain't I?

[0] - https://twitter.com/r3bl_/status/704041375562596352



> Wired's prediction is even more annoying because they've started begging me to turn off my adblocker last time I visited them a couple of days ago

Forbes "30 under 30": They don't let you read articles if you adblock... "To read this, you must disable". They create an article security nerds want to read... which then serves up a pop-under adware to steal passwords.

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160111/05574633295/forbe...

I lost my compassion after that one. (I didn't get bit... but I had disabled adblock for one or two of their articles temporarily... not again)


About 50 tracking, remarketing and generally privacy invasive scripts are executed on your browser [0] when visiting Forbes via their "Ad Light" experience.

Allowing all that scripting to run still didn't let me access the article. I can live without ever going to Forbes.

https://i.imgur.com/W6tYjHF.png


I think some sites do cruder checks for the addons themselves, so that whitelisting everything still doesn't work.


I dont think they are arguing that the future is better. Also going there today may not mean more money. For example what % of online ad money is being spend today on sponsored content ? That would matter.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: