A cool read. I listened to Vangelis while reading and it was very fitting.

You like our owl?

It's artificial?

@fastmath in Julia!

Is this a Cursor clone?

Not quite. It is a GUI for terminal coding agents. The built-in skills, system prompt, etc. still depends on the invoked CLI.

it's working for me (after the "are you human with consciousness" captcha challenge)

well, I am a P-zombie.

(for context: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_zombie and https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/zombies/)

Link to that good one?

It was a typo. I meant to say I haven't found a good one yet.

51 papers out of 4841 accepted papers is 1%. If these were the only papers, then I would say the review system actually doing pretty well. Considering how noisy the review processes are, I don't see this as a big problem on its own.

We can't stop people (or agents) from submitting low quality papers in the current system. We can improve the review quality, but at a human cost.

interesting; it skipped "we had everything before us," in my test. Yeah, not a good sign.

It would be terrible to be correponding with someone who implements the Napoleon technique, especially when they are your boss and a major bottleneck.

Since I'm on Cursor often these days, I just edit text with Cursor. With vim keys, highlight, then hotkey to call Mr. Agent Smith to do some magic.