I'm no expert on this, but I also read about this as I also tried calorie restriction.
You still have to keep your macros (and micros) in balance while on calorie deficit, which is even harder. Your body needs various things, you just need to optimize your food. Also, I think the main contributor for OPs issues was the fat deficit, which is very easy to fall into while you think you eat healthy a lean food. Fat is important for your hormone production.
In my experience(currently about 15kg into a 40kg weight-loss program), eating enough fat can also be very helpful for losing weight. It seems counter-intuitive, but it works for me. Fat contributes a great deal to satiety. My diet setup has been to have breakfast and dinner only, no lunch on most days. This way I can make both meals quite calorific, filling and plenty tasty. Crucial for maintaining adherence to the setup, which is by far the hardest part of weight loss.
When you have to go 7 to 8 hours without eating before dinner you want plenty of slow-burning calories. Long chain fats, protein, slow carbs, with plenty of fiber.
My typical breakfast ends up being one slice of bread with liver pate and cheese, another with peanut butter and either nutella(if I'm doing morning cardio or some other exercise mid-day. Lots of sugar in nutella, which gets used up immediately by the exercise anyway) or various kinds of jam with no added sugar(usually pear and apple, since they're not so tart and are pretty sweet without added sugar), and a protein pudding cup(20g protein). The bread needs to be whole-grain, of course. Ideally 100% whole grain.
This ends up being about 700 calories, which is a pretty substantial breakfast. And most importantly, it includes a lot of protein(from liver, peanut butter, cheese, the bread and the pudding), a good mix of saturated fats with plenty of SCFA and MCT from the cheese and liver, mono- and polyunsaturated fat from the peanut butter, and tons of soluble and insoluble fiber from the bread and peanut butter.
This tends to keep me full until dinner time, at which point I can typically eat up to 1300 kcal depending on how active I've been.
On extremely active days, I might either add another slice of bread to breakfast, or have a protein snack and some fruit after exercise, as well as electrolyte drink with sugar in it during(important both for energy and fluid uptake).
Anyway, I'm rarely hungry except for just before eating, which is the idea. I think this would be much harder on a low-fat diet.
1 and 2 kind of contradict themselves (or compliment, based on how much DRY we allow)... You want to make that abstraction when you need to have a single source of truth.
Also, the argument for 2 isn't very clear, it could be interpreted like the author doesn't understand inheritance.
You should have one source of truth for data. But frequently multiple implementations of the same, or similar, interface don't actually have the same semantics. By merging them, you now have the same source of truth for two distinct concepts.
They don't really contradict. That FOO and BAR look similar, does not mean they share some "truthfulness". Prematurely reaching to deduplicate and abstract them may lead to issues when you realise they aren't actually as similar as you thought, then you end up handling edge cases that wouldn't exist if you just kept the things separate to begin with.
I think several watch makers started to do something similar, but not sure if I would trust their software. However, Garmin has good health tracking features and they offer them in an analogue way with their vivomove line: https://www.garmin.com/en-IE/p/742133/pn/010-02566-00
Well I'm sure it looks trivial to you. But the joys of math often aren't in the difficulty but the discovery. Would your prefer it not have been stated at all, or did you just want to let us know you understood it.
As well, i think the 2k+1 thing is drastically more trivial and not at all equivalent being that all you need to know for 2k+1 is that 2k+1=odd. 4k and especially 6k take a larger generalization and different analytical method and often aren't included in the definition of the primes we learn like 2k+1 (odd) is.
Would you happen to know the justification behind "capitalize every commit subject line"[1]? I can understand finding it more appealing, but talking about it being as important as limiting the subject to 50 chars and not ending it with a period (which has a sensible justification), not as much.
They went for the right decision there, I wouldn't call it cheating. It's a nice to incorporate the importance/uniqueness of that planet in the dune world.
They could've just went for a horizontal line/pipe and noone wouldve cared.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yQHFCpO6gHE